<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Quickrelease.tv - Latest Comments</title><link>http://quickrelease.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://quickrelease.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:59:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Watch Le Tour in HD</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=538#comment-2205665286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;117&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sergey_D</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:59:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much better heron v ravenous beastie graphic</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=245#comment-1186410423</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HI THERES&lt;br&gt;MAY I KNOW WHEN THIS POSTER RALEIGH WITH TIGER PRODUCE/PRINTED?&lt;br&gt;WHAT MEAN X.A.D 2000?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TQ.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AHSOON</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 02:14:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Road-kill is too normal to be news</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1253#comment-1122588255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree, of course. Normally I wouldn't run such long extracts but, in this case, I feel there's a defence of 'public interest' and that somebody like Terry Jones would understand that his powerful story has more potential to change minds if it's disseminated rather than locked away in a children's book. I bought the book and would encourage others to do so, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carltonreid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Road-kill is too normal to be news</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1253#comment-1122585336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is all great stuff, but I feel duty bound to warn you that reproducing long extracts still means you could fall foul of copyright.&lt;br&gt;Put it this way, if I published a blog or web gallery with eight photos attached, and someone reproduced, say, five of them, I would go after them for © infringement and 'we only used some of them' would not be any kind of defence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Sparks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:48:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Traffic professionals need to understand why cyclists don&amp;#8217;t use &amp;#8220;cycle routes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1923#comment-1114806701</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gee. I sympathize with the cyclists from way over here (Greensburg, Indiana) because I ride in a place where I'm a steep minority, with motorists who actually get a kick from intimidating me and NO dedicated routes. The problem discussed above looks cultural- as I'm experiencing. Danes and Dutch have cycling over cars as an efficient mode of transport, development favoring cycling in some cases, equal in all cases and many don't love cars. UK has Top Gear- the worlds biggest TV show dedicated to the love fest with cars. A quick Yank comparison, sure, please forgive me- but it's there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm also a civil engineer with past road traffic design experience. We did much of it by driving the route and assessing a solution from a car. Design of cycling routes should be performed the same way- by 100% or 75% pure cyclists (who are the civil designers), evaluating the routes, and the solutions. There needs to be a place in the civil design firms for real cyclists.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Gorman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 22:28:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Traffic professionals need to understand why cyclists don&amp;#8217;t use &amp;#8220;cycle routes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1923#comment-1114425680</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If they were any good, then we'd use them, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems obvious to me that if cyclists refuse to use these facilities "built at not inconsiderable cost to the taxpayer" (what's with the double negative?), then perhaps the project was as "successful" as our self-congratulatory local authority engineer seems to think he is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cyclelicious</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:41:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #space4cycling is a clever slogan. Could it have been even cleverer still?</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1908#comment-1097569416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mais certainement! I keep a Brompton in the cab and it gets used daily.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clive Matthews</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:13:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #space4cycling is a clever slogan. Could it have been even cleverer still?</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1908#comment-1097565928</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All cycling is good, n'est-ce pas?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carltonreid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #space4cycling is a clever slogan. Could it have been even cleverer still?</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1908#comment-1097558099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's actually Racetech &lt;a href="http://www.racetech.co.uk/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.racetech.co.uk/"&gt;http://www.racetech.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;, yes I work from their York base.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clive Matthews</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:05:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #space4cycling is a clever slogan. Could it have been even cleverer still?</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1908#comment-1097556483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Company is Racing UK and you know 'em?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carltonreid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:03:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #space4cycling is a clever slogan. Could it have been even cleverer still?</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1908#comment-1097547446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Half of all employees, most of the drivers and the CEO are 'vehicular' cyclists.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clive Matthews</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:54:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #space4cycling is a clever slogan. Could it have been even cleverer still?</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1908#comment-1097532735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HGV driver who may also be a cyclist, vehicular or otherwise?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS&lt;br&gt;I don't mind these placards on the back of motor vehicles, I'm slightly worried about them when fixed to saddles and the like. Some time in the future somebody could say such placements prove there's space for a bicycle registration plate...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carltonreid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:39:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #space4cycling is a clever slogan. Could it have been even cleverer still?</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1908#comment-1097528881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another driver happy to share with vehicular cyclists!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clive Matthews</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:35:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robocars are coming. Will they be good or bad for cycling?</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1882#comment-1082903774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The liability issues are covered by Brad Templeton in his blog. &lt;a href="http://www.templetons.com/brad/robocars/accident.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.templetons.com/brad/robocars/accident.html"&gt;http://www.templetons.com/b...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carltonreid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:25:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Robocars are coming. Will they be good or bad for cycling?</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1882#comment-1081761629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it will be interesting to see how manufacturer liability plays into this. Driverless vehicle crashes seems to expose the manufacturers to more lawsuits. Perhaps this will push some of them to take a more serious approach to safety.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddscott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:24:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Riding retro: the reunion for the first ever MTB World Championsips</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1827#comment-1056813262</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good to hear from you, Drew.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ah, those were the days…&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carltonreid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 03:41:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Riding retro: the reunion for the first ever MTB World Championsips</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1827#comment-1056755621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember (some of) that.&lt;br&gt;I only have vague memories of those days but I do know it was an exciting time. Good to see the faces of people I've lost touch with. Those were the days when I didn't have a belly, moobs, multiple chins and a cowardly hairline.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for posting that piece - gave me a warm glow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Drew Lawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 01:43:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Victim-blaming barrister needs a new insect analogy</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1870#comment-1033182486</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, three.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have no idea whether this is normal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carltonreid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 04:16:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Victim-blaming barrister needs a new insect analogy</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1870#comment-1033020402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am curious that you had three, is that right, Magistrates sitting on the bench.  Which Court level is this? I don't think we have that sought of representation unless it is an appeals case (and we model pretty much the British system as well).  Anyway just curious to know how it works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aushiker</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 22:29:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Victim-blaming barrister needs a new insect analogy</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1870#comment-1033019228</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes thankfully they are rare, but and this may have something to do with time I spend commuting (around two hours each way) or that I ride in Western Australia but I seem to encounter quite a few near misses. Of which a few are serious enough to warrant passing on the Police. Of those reported to the Police the trend has more recently been towards the issuing of Traffic Infringement Notices or at least a chat to the driver (I am probably also getting better at judging which ones to bother to report).  Hopefully those chats result in improved driving and the next cyclist does not become a statistic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aushiker</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 22:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Victim-blaming barrister needs a new insect analogy</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1870#comment-1032615957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Driver was in the yellow box and knew he had to get out. Signalling isn't  a right to move, it's to tell others you may move, if it's safe to do so. It wasn't safe. &lt;br&gt;Then stopping and taking you out was pure evil.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carltonreid</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:19:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Victim-blaming barrister needs a new insect analogy</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1870#comment-1032524861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a well-informed and considered response, you must be very proud of yourself... I particularly enjoyed your capitalisation...&lt;br&gt;I wasn't chasing anyone, I was riding quick - there is a difference.&lt;br&gt;I did get annoyed by the actions taken by the driver, I only just managed to avoid going into him. Annoyance is a natural reaction to other people's actions. I'm not especially proud of shouting at him but his reaction was not acceptable.&lt;br&gt;I wasn't in the road "you tart" I was on the pavement. I was told to stay there by the police officer as she insisted that I needed a bandage (which I didn't want).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bigblokeonabike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:54:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Victim-blaming barrister needs a new insect analogy</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1870#comment-1032398716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that incident should never have happened, if you rode more defensively and didn't get annoyed like a little prick shouting at people and chasing them. also, get up off the road you tart. i've broken my arm and then ridden home 20 miles and i stayed on the deck for less time than that. man up and take some responsibility for YOUR style of riding. yes, car driver is a prick, but so are you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:01:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Victim-blaming barrister needs a new insect analogy</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1870#comment-1032194085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So "erratic" is a meme, then.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hmm.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carltonreid</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:00:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Victim-blaming barrister needs a new insect analogy</title><link>http://quickrelease.tv/?p=1870#comment-1032154540</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a similar experience in relation to this incident:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZoLDbWcqY8" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZoLDbWcqY8"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this case the video evidence helped a LOT.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I too felt that I was on trial not the defendent. When the defendent described me as riding erratically and not checking my shoulder before pulling out it really burned me that I couldn't answer that - you can actually see me checking my shoulder before I pull out on the video!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my case the driver said that I fell off my bike not because I hit his car but because there was a pile up of cyclists as I was riding erratically!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The defence barrister used similar tricks obviously saying that I was unsafe and going too fast.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The guy was found guilty and I was described as a "credible witness who's statement had a ring of truth about it", the defendents statement was described as less credible.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At one point the prosectution said that they may have to re-call me in light of the new evidence (the pile up that was not on the video or in the police witness statement) but the magistate said "no I don't think that will be necessary" - in other words they knew he was full of sh*t!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He got around £700 costs and 5 points on his licence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bigblokeonabike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>